Cases 11 - 20 of 824
William Webb, Jr. v. Kirk Neal, et al
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
KIRK NEAL, Corporal at SCI and C/O EDGAR VERDE
Elizabeth Peter v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 24-1263
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PETER, Beneficiary for the Estate of Elizabeth Peter
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, JUDGE LOUIS BELASCO, OFFICER CANNON, #126, Hamilton Township Police Department and others
Garnishee:
PROSECUTOR JENNA M. COOK, Central Municipal Court
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
William Webb, Jr. v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RENEE HRIVNAK, Deputy Attorney General for Department of Justice and others
Thomas Dewald v. French, et al
as 23-3268
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW DEWALD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRENCH, Franklin County Prison, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REED, Franklin County Prison, LIEUTENANT GARY ARTER and others
William Dark, Jr. v. Warden Butler County Jail
as 23-3210
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LACELL DARK, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN BUTLER COUNTY JAIL
Robert Dorsey, II v. Rebecca Peters, et al
as 23-3216
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. DORSEY, II
Defendant:
LPN REBECCA PETERS, CASE MANAGER A. FOURA-WHITE, NURSE K. WILLIAMS and others
Shaheed Williams v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 23-3164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAHEED WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI
Quentin Salmond v. Nathan Williams, et al
as 23-3131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUENTIN SALMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
