Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Asher Conn v. Troy Williamson, et al
as 08-2666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHER CONN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SCOTT DODRILL, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP, AHMED ABDEL SALAM, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP, HARRELL WATTS, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP and others
Asher Conn v. Troy Williamson, et al, et al
as 08-2581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHER CONN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SCOTT DODRILL, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP, AHMED ABDEL SALAM, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP, HARRELL WATTS, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP and others
Corral v. Samuels, et al
as 08-2444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PABLO FAVELA CORRAL
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY BOYCE, DHO, D. SCOTT DODRILL, DHO, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, DHO and others
David Womack v. Joseph Smith, et al
as 08-2229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. WOMACK
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SCOTT DODRILL, KENNETH GABRIELSON, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Michael Sharpe v. Sean Costello, et al
as 08-1811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHARPE
Defendant - Appellee:
SEAN COSTELLO, D. SCOTT DODRILL, FRANK KARAM and others
Armstrong v. Grondolsky, et al
as 08-1611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOISKY, WARDEN and D. SCOTT DODRILL, REGIONAL DIRECTOR BOP PHILADELPHIA
Asher Conn v. Troy Williamson, et al
as 08-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHER CONN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SCOTT DODRILL, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP, HARRELL WATTS, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP and TROY WILLIAMSON, Regional Director, Northeast Region, BOP
Defendant:
AHMED ABDEL SALAM, (former) doctor
Barner v. Williamson, et al
as 08-1025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN K. BARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND ALEXANDER, Correction Officer, BEDFORD, Correction Officer, KEVIN BITTENBENDER, Correction Officer and others
Not Party - Amicus Curiae:
COURT APPOINTED AMICUS CURIAE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
