Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Joseph Donahue
as 17-2391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. DONAHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Joseph Donahue
as 17-2390
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. DONAHUE
Frank Dippolito v. USA, et al
as 17-1048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General in his Capacity as Administrrtor of the Second Chance Act, HARLEY LAPPIN, Fomer FBOP Director in his Capacity as FBOP Director and others
Debtor - Appellee:
YEOMAN, Tool Room Officer in his Capacity as FCI Officer
Donahue Dewar v. Warden Loretto FCI
as 16-1259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONAHUE DEWAR
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LORETTO FCI
USA v. Joseph Donahue
as 14-3161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. DONAHUE
Robert Oleson v. Spalding, et al
as 13-3484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. OLESON
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. SPALDING, MS. BROWN, MR. DONAHUE and others
Defendant:
MR. HEFFRON, SANTOS, PORCARRO and others
Karim Faruq v. Mary McCollum, et al
as 13-3229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARIM FARUQ
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY MCCOLLUM, Case Manager, F.C.I. Fort Dix, DAVID SCHAAFF, Unit Manager, F.C.I. Fort Dix and ROBERT DONAHUE, CMC, F.C.I. Fort Dix
Frank Dippolito v. USA, et al
as 12-4446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Robert Oleson v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-3650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. OLESON
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, SPALDING, Mr., BROWN, Ms. and others
Lewis v. Pearsall, et al
as 10-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMIE LEWIS, a/k/a Emmanuel E. Elder
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY PEARSALL, ANDREW DONAHUE, CHARLOTTE SELIG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
