Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Jeffrey Williams v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-1529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
In re: David S. Johnson
as 13-1462
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant - Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Kelley O'Donnell v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-1430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLEY O'DONNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Christopher Carroll v. Marirosa Lama
as 13-1303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER E. CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS
David Wicks v. Kimberly Barkley, et al
as 13-1171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Probation and Parole, MARIROSA LAMAS, Facility Manager of Rockview, TIM MILLER, Correctional Class & Program Managerof Rockview and others
Christopher Carroll v. Marirosa Lama
as 12-4391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER E. CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS
Jermaine Lofton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 12-4387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE LOFTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS, ROBERT MARSH and others
Jafarnia Williams v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-4353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAFARNIA WILLIAMS, AKA Jeffrey Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
William Zoomie v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-4297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM P. ZOOMIE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, Superintendent, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Michael Royster v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-4168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ROYSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
