Cases 51 - 60 of 233
Fabrice Snowden v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 20-1996
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI, CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FABRICE SNOWDEN
Daniel Boyd v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 20-1987
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PATRICK BOYD
Julio Lopez-Pena v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 20-1984
Defendant:
WARDEN FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO C. LOPEZ-PENA
Jeremy Pinson v. S. Valencick, et al
as 20-1947
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU HEATH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY V. PINSON
In re: Lenny Cain
as 20-1801
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DHO BITTENBENDER, WARDEN SPAULDING and others
Petitioner:
In re: LENNY CAIN
Theophilus Akwei v. BOP, et al
as 20-1604
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ZIMMERLY, GEO GROUP INC, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEOPHILUS AKWEI
Raymond Aigbekaen v. Bureau of Prisons
as 20-1351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
James Biggins v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 20-1215
Defendant:
C/O TAYLOR, C/O ALEXANDER, C/O HOLCOMBE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SANOTA, Security Chief, JOHN BRENNAN, Security Chief, BUREAU CHIEF PRISON HEALTHCARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Steven Ray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 20-1108
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN L. RAY
Vaughn Curtis v. BOP
as 19-3952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VAUGHN J. CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
