Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jamel FordIn re: Jamel Ford
as 24-1004
Petitioner:
In re: JAMEL M. FORD
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Jeffery Richardson, et al v. Nicholas Oriolo, et al
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY RICHARDSON and COLBY RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS ORIOLO, JAMEL SEMPER, All defendants will be sued in both their personal capacity as individuals and their official capacity as officers and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Jamel Carlton v. Warden Atlantic County Justice Facility, et al
as 22-1488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL CARLTON
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
USA v. Jamel Covington
as 22-1114
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL COVINGTON, also known as MEL LOVE also known as MAL also known as JAMAL ABDUL COVINGTON
Jamel Ford v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 21-1612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL M. FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
USA v. Jamel Hurtt
as 20-2494
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL HURTT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jamel Davis v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 20-1860
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL DAVIS
USA v. Jamell Birt
as 19-3820
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMELL BIRT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jamel Easter
as 19-2587
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL E. EASTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Lee v. Cynthia Link, et al
as 19-2635
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA BANTA, in her individual capacity, CYNTHIA LINK, in her individual capacity and JAMELLE NORRIS, in her individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
