Cases 1 - 10 of 414
Kathleen Dorsett v. Warden New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1881
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. DORSETT
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Jermaine Vaughn v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1822
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE VAUGHN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Charles Sheppard v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1697
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SHEPPARD
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
John Biddle v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1661
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. BIDDLE
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Ralph BakerIn re: Ralph Baker
as 24-1633
Petitioner:
In re: RALPH BAKER
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and MICHAEL E. FARBIARZ
Carl Holdren v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1617
Plaintiff:
CARL J. HOLDREN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Marcus White v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1578
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ST. CLAIRE WHITE
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Frederico Bruno v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1349
Plaintiff:
FREDERICO BRUNO
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and PROSECUTOR HUDSON COUNTY
Josh Pompey v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
JOSH POMPEY
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Charles Sheppard v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 23-3200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SHEPPARD
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
