General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
MELENDEZ v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00683
Petitioner: GARY MELENDEZ
Respondent: DR. LAUREL R. HARRY, PA DOC Secretary, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURKE v. PA DOC et al
as 2:2023cv02598
Petitioner: MICHAEL BURKE
Respondent: PA DOC, THE HEARING EXAMINER OF SCI CHESTER and THE OFFICIALS OF SCI CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARLON et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (DOC) et al
as 5:2022cv02060
Petitioner: OLIVEIRA FLORINDA MARLON and JUAN ANAYA
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (DOC), LEHIGH COUNTY ADULT PROBATION, LEHIGH COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PITTMAN v. WETZEL
as 5:2019cv04945
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA DOC, WETZEL
Petitioner: GABRIEL PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01063
Respondent: PA DOC Secretary, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner: PARIS LAVAR GANTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv01063
Respondent: PA DOC Secretary, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner: PARIS LAVAR GANTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FAVORS v. PENNA. DEPT. OF CORRECTION (DOC). et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00887
Petitioner: PERCY FAVORS
Respondent: PENNA. DEPT. OF CORRECTION (DOC)., PENNA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PBPP) and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?