Cases 51 - 60 of 404
BIESKI v. COMCAST CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv02467
Plaintiff:
MARK BIESKI
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION
SNELL v. INSOMNIA COOKIES
as 2:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
SHYLIA SNELL
Defendant:
INSOMNIA COOKIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KRITZER v. WILMAC CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv01577
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA KRITZER
Defendant:
WILMAC CORPORATION, MC WIL GROUP LTD., THE BRUNSWICK RESIDENCES, INC. doing business as The Brunswick At Attleboro and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
KRITZER v. WILMAC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01577
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA KRITZER
Defendant:
WILMAC CORPORATION, MC WIL GROUP LTD., THE BRUNSWICK RESIDENCES, INC. doing business as THE BRUNSWICK AT ATTLEBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
RIOS v. HEALTH PARTNERS PLANS, INC.
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN RIOS
Defendant:
HEALTH PARTNERS PLANS, INC.
NORTHROP v. EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID NORTHROP
Defendant:
EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC and JOSEPH MAROTTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
UCETA v. SHARP CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
ANYERILYS UCETA
Defendant:
SHARP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
UCETA v. SHARP CORPORATION
as 5:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
ANYERILYS UCETA
Defendant:
SHARP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Merrifield v. The Giant Company d/b/a Giant Food Stores
as 2:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Katrina Merrifield
Defendant:
The Giant Company d/b/a Giant Food Stores
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Smith v. Keystone Premier Settlement Services, LLC
as 5:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Lucy Smith
Defendant:
Keystone Premier Settlement Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
