Cases 41 - 50 of 55
GARCES et al v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
YVETTE M. GARCES and ERIK GARCES
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC., COCHLEAR AMERICAS and TYCO INTEGRATED SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DARDEN et al v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03635
Plaintiff:
VALERIE DARDEN and RUFUS BROWN
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORE #2141
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODMAN et al v. WALMART STORES, INC.
as 2:2014cv02128
Plaintiff:
SANDRA RODMAN and WILLIAM RODMAN
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NACHUM v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2013cv05442
Plaintiff:
YOCHEVED NACHUM
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP , WAL-MART SUPERCENTER , WAL-MART PROPERTIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REGALADO et al v. ROYERS et al
as 5:2012cv03773
Plaintiff:
VICTOR REGALADO , ANAYELI LOPEZ , AMADOR LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
ELIZABETH ROYERS , NATIONAL FREIGHT, INC. and WALMART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NICHOLS v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01801
Plaintiff:
TARA NICHOLS
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC. , WALMART STORES EAST, L.P. and WALMART STORE #2830
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER et al v. WALMART STORES, EAST LP et al
as 2:2010cv05869
Plaintiff:
LORETTA BAKER and DANIEL SOLOMON
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, EAST LP and WALMART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DIEHL v. WALMART STORE, INC.
as 2:2010cv03805
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN DIEHL
Defendant:
WALMART STORE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALTER et al v. WALMART STORES, INC.
as 2:2010cv03437
Plaintiff:
VALERIE WALTER and MATTHEW WALTER
Defendant:
WALMART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
