Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
NIEDERMEYER v. GESTALT LOGISTICS, INC et al
as 5:2022cv01955
Plaintiff:
SALLY NIEDERMEYER and FRANCES A. BROWN
Defendant:
GESTALT LOGISTICS, INC, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE, INC, ROOSEVELT LOUISSAINT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WILLIAMS v. FEDEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION and FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Khaytin v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 2:2021cv05354
Plaintiff:
Roman Khaytin
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and JOHN DOE/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00888
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FISCHER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2019cv04924
Plaintiff:
CHRISTA B. FISCHER and Andrew Rakowsky
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTTEM, INC. and FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Petitioner:
ANDRE SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
