Cases 51 - 60 of 337
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01927
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01911
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wright v. A-1 Towing and Recovery, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01229
Plaintiff:
Dina Wright
Defendant:
A-1 Towing and Recovery, LLC, Pelican Auto Finance, LLC, Westlake Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Corman et al v. Torres et al
as 1:2018cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jacob Corman , Michael Folmer , Lou Barletta and others
Defendant:
Robert Torres and Jonathan M. Marks
Amicu:
Brian McCann , National Democratic Redistricting Committee , League of Women Voters of Pennyslvania and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Carmen Febo San Miguel , James Solomon , John Greiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowry v. Shipley Energy Company et al
as 1:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
John Lowry
Defendant:
Shipley Energy Company , Shipley Choice, LLC and Shipley Fuels Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kennedy v. Dutcavage et al
as 3:2018cv00767
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Defendant:
David John Dutcavage, George Francis Halcovage, Joseph G Groody and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
