Cases 131 - 140 of 147
King v. Williamson et al
as 3:2008cv01827
Plaintiff:
Gary King
Defendant:
Troy Williamson, Estrada, Ray Laws and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Boyd-Chisholm v. Corbett
as 3:2008cv01784
Petitioner:
Gary A Boyd-Chisholm
Respondent:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr. and John A Palakovich
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bivins v. Karestes et al
as 3:2008cv01531
Petitioner:
Gary Bivins
Respondent:
John Karestes, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. Grace et al
as 4:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
Henry Unseld Washington
Defendant:
James L. Grace, David J. Wakefield, R. M. Lawler and others
Amicu:
G C Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00932
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Harley G. Lappin, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rhines v. State of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2008cv00818
Plaintiff:
Gary Rhines
Defendant:
State of Pennsylvania, Dustin J. Kreitz, Thomas H. Ungard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrick v. Beard et al
as 3:2008cv00489
Petitioner:
Gary Dean Barrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D. and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. McVey et al
as 1:2007cv01301
Plaintiff:
John D. Wilson
Defendant:
Catherine McVey, Allen Castor, Jeffrey Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vinbaytel v. Angelini
as 1:2007cv01050
Petitioner:
Gary Vinbaytel
Respondent:
Christopher Angelini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Addy et al
as 3:2007cv00928
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Smith
Defendant:
David Addy, Casimir Kosciolek, Gary Dobias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
