Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Herrera v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Herrera
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Personnel, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrera v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Herrera
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. United States
as 4:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
James E. Murphy
Defendant:
Ms. White, N.C. English, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pratt v. Department of Justice (DOJ) et al
as 3:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Henry Pratt
Defendant:
Homeland Security (DHS), United States Government (USG), Warden Clair Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02062
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents, At Least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the bop operating from the special housing Unit, An Unknown Named Number of Other United States Government Agents and others
Amicu:
Nancy-Ann E. DeParle
Fifth_party_defendant:
Mona K. Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bennett v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv00991
Petitioner:
Bobby Daniel Bennett
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henriquez v. United States Immigration Service et al
as 4:2007cv00473
Petitioner:
Miguel Henriquez
Respondent:
United States Immigration Service and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
