Cases 141 - 150 of 715
SQUIRES v. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION
as 3:2022cv00063
Defendant:
THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION and TK ELEVATOR AMERICAS
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLA SQUIRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WEEMS v. HAMILTON
as 2:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WEEMS
Defendant:
BRIAN TIMOTHY HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
EVANS v. VERBA et al
as 3:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
JOEL EVANS
Defendant:
MATTHEW VERBA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Mohamed v. Babkkir et al
as 2:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Lokman Mohamed
Defendant:
ESSAM E. BABKKIR, Edirgawi Transport, Inc., Olga Schilk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
CRILE v. WYCKOFF et al
as 2:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
BONNIE CRILE
Defendant:
ROBERT WYCKOFF and YVONNE NANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
RODRIGUEZ v. CAVANAUGH et al
as 2:2022cv00285
Defendant:
WILLIAM CAVANAUGH, DONNA R. CAVANAUGH and BILL CAVANAUGH
Plaintiff:
JIM RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ERNST et al v. DONAHOE et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK W. ERNST and VIRGINIA R. ERNST
Defendant:
LORRAINE D. DONAHOE, US XPRESS LEASING, INC. and U.S. XPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRANK v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
ANA L. FRANK
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SMITH, XPO LOGISTICS and XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DERRINGER v. NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE DERRINGER
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
KASUNICK v. CAI
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN KASUNICK
Defendant:
MIN CAI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
