Antitrust Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 131 - 140 of 159
PREMIUM MOTOR CARS, INC. v. MANHEIM AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00061
Counter Claimant: DEALER SERVICES CORPORATION, DEALER SERVICES CORPORATION, MANHEIM AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Counter Defendant: PREMIUM MOTOR CARS, INC., PREMIUM MOTOR CARS, INC., PREMIUM MOTOR CARS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: MANHEIM AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and MANHEIM AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
ThirdParty Defendant: RONALD W. WOBB and RONALD W. WOBB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IMMERMAN v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00027
Plaintiff: RICHARD IMMERMAN
Defendant: BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER AG, BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CHEMOINICS CORPORATION v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2006cv01687
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
RUBBER ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. BAYER AG et al
as 2:2006cv01604
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
GIANT EAGLE, INC. et al v. EASTERN MUSHROOM MARKETING COOPERATIVE, INC. et al
as 2:2006cv00449
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
RESCO PRODUCTS, INC. v. NANCHUAN MINERALS GROUP CO., LTD. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv00235
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BAUER v. LLOYD RALSTON GALLERY, INC et al
as 2:2005cv01288
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
MUMFORD et al v. GNC FRANCHISING LLC et al
as 2:2005cv01280
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CONEMAUGH HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 3:2005cv00318
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
ROTOLO v. CANADA LIFE ASSURANC, et al
as 2:2005cv00474
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?