Cases 141 - 150 of 194
Arner v. PGT Trucking, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00565
Plaintiff:
Mark Arner and Mark Arner
Defendant:
PGT TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
WEISMANTLE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2009cv00467
Plaintiff:
RICHARD T. WEISMANTLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
ZAWATSKI v. FRANKLIN SQUARE L.P.
as 2:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
STANLEY R. ZAWATSKI
Defendant:
FRANKLIN SQUARE L.P.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
REARDON v. CLOSETMAID CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv01730
Plaintiff:
R. CATHY REARDON
Defendant:
CLOSETMAID CORPORATION and EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TAYLOR v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 2:2008cv01258
Plaintiff:
CINDY TAYLOR
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PERSHING v. WINDBER MEDICAL CENTER
as 3:2008cv00181
Plaintiff:
CARY PERSHING
Defendant:
WINDBER MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
ZELINSKY et al v. STAPLES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00684
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ZELINSKY and JEFF LOUGHNER
Defendant:
STAPLES, INC. and DOES 1 TRHOUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
WALKER v. DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2008cv00267
Plaintiff:
ALISA WALKER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
MILLER v. SOLAR POWER INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2007cv01111
Plaintiff:
DELVIN A. MILLER
Defendant:
SOLAR POWER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
CASE v. HIGHMARK, INC.
as 2:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CASE
Defendant:
HIGHMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
