Cases 61 - 70 of 308
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. et al v. THE SOULE CO.
as 2:2017cv00607
Plaintiff:
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. , ALESSIO PIGAZZI and GLENN KEILAR
Defendant:
THE SOULE CO.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. et al v. ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. , ALESSIO PIGAZZI and GLENN KEILAR
Defendant:
ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC v. CRF, INC
as 2:2015cv00918
Plaintiff:
ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC
Defendant:
CRF, INC doing business as CRF HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. v. DUPACO, INC.
as 2:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
XODUS MEDICAL, INC.
Defendant:
DUPACO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SILCOTEK CORPORATION v. ADVANCED MATERIALS COMPONENTS EXPRESS, L.L.C.
as 3:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
SILCOTEK CORPORATION
Defendant:
ADVANCED MATERIALS COMPONENTS EXPRESS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
AMERICAN TEXTILE COMPANY, INC. v. HOLLANDER SLEEP PRODUCTS, LLC
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN TEXTILE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
HOLLANDER SLEEP PRODUCTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
CASARI v. QUAIL ELECTRONICS, INC.
as 2:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
DEREK CASARI
Defendant:
QUAIL ELECTRONICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
NORRIS et al v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
KAREN A. NORRIS and HEATHER KLING
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH , LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER-NEW ORLEANS , BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LSU AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEURO KINETICS, INC. v. CINBERG et al
as 2:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
NEURO KINETICS, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES Z. CINBERG and THE BALANCE DISORDER CENTER OF NEW JERSEY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
SIMIO, LLC v. FLEXSIM SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2016cv01710
Plaintiff:
SIMIO, LLC
Defendant:
FLEXSIM SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
