Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MAHOOD v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
BETH MAHOOD
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP and PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HANNA v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv00394
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS. CO., UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION, PROVIDENT COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. HANNA, D.M.D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FIEHLER v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2020cv00334
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. FIEHLER
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP and PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOE v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2019cv00628
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUSAINI v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2014cv00636
Plaintiff:
SYED N. HUSAINI
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SIGAL v. THE GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. SIGAL
Defendant:
THE GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
HAKIM v. UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2011cv01265
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HAKIM
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP and PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARDING v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
THERESA HARDING
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PLAZA-PONTE v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
MARIO PLAZA-PONTE, M.D.
Defendant:
PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOIDEL v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2008cv00344
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. MOIDEL
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
