Cases 121 - 130 of 275
GABYZON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv01470
Plaintiff:
CAROL GABYZON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. R.S. CARLIN, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv00272
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
R.S. CARLIN, INC. and JANUM MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ELINOFF
as 2:2010cv01396
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BRUCE KREUTZER
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. ELINOFF
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BEEMAN et al
as 1:2010cv00237
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EBERT G. BEEMAN, FIFTH THIRD FINANCIAL, LLC, AUTUMN FROST, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REPASKY
as 1:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. REPASKY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LORENO et al
as 1:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LARRY A. LORENO, DARLENE A. LORENO, MERCER COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZARRA et al
as 2:2010cv00811
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN ZARRA and MARSHA ZARRA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
ESTATE OF ANTONIO J. PALUMBO DECEASED v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv00760
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ANTONIO J. PALUMBO DECEASED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CUDA et al
as 2:2010cv00617
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY D. CUDA and BRIAN DANKIS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MODEL DEVELOPMENT LLC
as 2:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MODEL DEVELOPMENT LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
