Cases 1 - 10 of 17
JUMBA BAKER et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN JUMBA BAKER, BRITTANY MERCER, MATTHEW O'BRIEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and MATTHEW LACKNER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. 3 B'S LOUNGE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01478
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
3 B'S LOUNGE, INC., ERIC K. BAKER, RALPH K. BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BAKER v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC.
as 2:2015mc00373
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BAKER
Defendant:
BLACK & DECKER (U.S.), INC.
PINE INSTRUMENT COMPANY et al v. CONTROLS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
PINE INSTRUMENT COMPANY and PINE TEST EQUIPMENT, LLC
Defendant:
CONTROLS USA, INC. and GORDON BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ALLHOUSE et al v. GORELL et al
as 3:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
CINDY A. ALLHOUSE , TAMMY S. ARBLE , JAMES M. BLAIR and others
Defendant:
WAYNE GORELL and BRIAN ZIMMERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPECIAL TRADING FUND v. BONTEMPO et al
as 2:2013cv01401
Plaintiff:
SPECIAL TRADING FUND
Defendant:
ROBERT N. BONTEMPO , NICHOLAS P. CONSTANTAKIS , DAVID L. DENINNO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
BISCH et al v. BONTEMPO et al
as 2:2013cv01392
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BISCH and DAVID SHAEV
Defendant:
ROBERT N. BONTEMPO , NICHOLAS P. CONSTANTAKIS , DAVID L. DENINNO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
