Cases 41 - 50 of 67
KREDEL v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
as 2:2014cv01201
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE KREDEL
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
JONES v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2013cv00510
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN JONES
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HURST v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv01884
Plaintiff:
RONALD R. HURST
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CHRISTENSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv01885
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHRISTENSON
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TURMO v. THE HARTFORD
as 2:2012cv01402
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY TURMO
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MINUTELLO v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv01240
Plaintiff:
THERESA R. MINUTELLO
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MAYHUGH v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00770
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. MAYHUGH, JR.
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MATTHEWS v. THE GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00336
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ZURICK v. THE HARTFORD
as 2:2012cv00258
Plaintiff:
FRANCES M. ZURICK
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MILLER v. THE HARTFORD
as 2:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
DAWNA L. MILLER
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
