Cases 71 - 80 of 89
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al v. BUTCH & MCCREE PAVING, INC
as 2:2009cv01667
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA, LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION ADVANCEMENT FUND and others
Defendant:
BUTCH & MCCREE PAVING, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al v. GEYER & SON, INC
as 2:2009cv01487
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA, LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HEAVY & HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION ADVANCEMENT FUND and others
Defendant:
GEYER & SON, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
RENNEKAMP SUPPLY COMPANY v. LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PENSION FUND
as 2:2009cv01443
Plaintiff:
RENNEKAMP SUPPLY COMPANY
Defendant:
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS et al v. ARTEX PAINTING & DECORATING CO.
as 2:2009cv01386
Plaintiff:
I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS and THE INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
ARTEX PAINTING & DECORATING CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al v. J. WILLIAM PUSTELAK, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00249
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA, LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FUND and others
Defendant:
J. WILLIAM PUSTELAK, INC., TIMOTHY J. PUSTELAK, CYCLE CITY OF ERIE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al v. TERRITO CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00478
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA, LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FUND and others
Defendant:
TERRITO CONSTRUCTION, INC., JOSEPH C. TERRITO and CAROL TERRITO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS et al v. HORTERT et al
as 2:2009cv00105
Plaintiff:
I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS, THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 and THE INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
LOUIS HORTERT and JANET HORTERT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al v. OAKDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC et al
as 2:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA, LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HEAVY & HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION ADVANCEMENT FUND and others
Defendant:
OAKDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC, ROBERT V. SEPICH and THOMAS E. SEPICH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al v. KING ENTERPRISE, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01468
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA, LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM OF WESTERN PA FUND and others
Defendant:
KING ENTERPRISE, INC. and JOSEPH KING
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND et al v. DWAYNE COOPER ENTERPRISES
as 1:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
IBEW LOCAL NO. 56 VACATION FUND, NATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE COUNCIL, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant:
DWAYNE COOPER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
