Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Anel Hubbard v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 21-3011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANEL HUBBARD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Luis Reyes v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 21-2863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS E. REYES
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Charles Scott v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 21-2864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Duane Rollins v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 21-2739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUANE ROLLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Vaughn TiedemanIn re: Vaughn Tiedeman
as 21-2362
Petitioner:
In re: VAUGHN TIEDEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SUSAN D WIGENTON
James RileyIn re: James Riley
as 21-2126
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES W. RILEY, DEDRP
Julian Bodnari v. Warden James T Vaughn CC, et al
as 21-2116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIAN BODNARI
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
William Webb, Jr.In re: William Webb, Jr.
as 21-1912
Respondent:
JOHN A. CERINO and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Shannon Harris v. Warden James T Vaughn Correct, et al
as 21-1876
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON HARRIS
Claude Lacombe v. Warden James T Vaughn Correct, et al
as 21-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAUDE P. LACOMBE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
