Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CLARK COUNTY v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06568
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CLARK COUNTY
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALDEN LEEDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv07326
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALDEN LEEDS, INC., ALLIANCE CHEMICAL, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Intervenor:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
PRADOS v. METROMILE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
HERNAN PRADOS
Defendant:
METROMILE, INC., DAN PRESTON, COLIN BRYANT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv17478
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BALCH v. TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06775
Defendant:
TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC., MYRON E. ULLMAN, III, CIA BUCKLEY MARAKOVITS and others
Plaintiff:
COLBY BALCH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv18577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
