Cases 81 - 90 of 98
Donohue v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00355
Petitioner:
Frederick B. Donohue
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brunson v. Seymour
as 1:2009cv00345
Petitioner:
Joseph Bernard Brunson
Respondent:
Margaret B. Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. Seymour
as 1:2009cv00328
Petitioner:
Timothy McQueen
Respondent:
Margaret B. Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Seymour
as 1:2009cv00287
Petitioner:
Larry Andrea Hill
Respondent:
Margaret B. Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pough v. Seymour
as 1:2009cv00280
Petitioner:
Tony Bernard Pough
Respondent:
Margaret B. Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. Seymour
as 1:2009cv00278
Petitioner:
Timothy McQueen
Respondent:
Margaret B. Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brunson v. Seymour
as 1:2009cv00281
Petitioner:
Joseph Bernard Brunson
Respondent:
Margaret B. Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riches v. Cochran et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr., Ulysses Torey, Jose Ernesto Medellin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibbs v. Robinson et al
as 1:2008cv00480
Plaintiff:
Arson I. Gibbs, Sr.
Defendant:
Sue L. Robinson, Anthony J. Scirica, Dolores K. Sloviter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Awala v. International Court of Justice et al
as 1:2008cv00400
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
International Court of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
