Cases 11 - 20 of 32
ALLEGHENY VENTURES, INC. v. WOODLAND AKERS, LTD.
as 2:2021cv05552
Petitioner:
ALLEGHENY VENTURES, INC.
Respondent:
APPALACHIAN HEATING, LLC and WOODLAND AKERS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
SEVEN SEVENTEEN CREDIT UNION, INC. v. YEAGER
as 2:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
SEVEN SEVENTEEN CREDIT UNION, INC.
Defendant:
TIMOTHY B. YEAGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. EDDYSTONE BOROUGH
as 2:2020cv05534
Defendant:
EDDYSTONE BOROUGH
Plaintiff:
AGATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERIRX, INC. v. THE REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2020cv02212
Defendant:
THE REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, David T. Wong, D.M.D, D.M.Sc., ARURAS HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PERIRX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. R & M MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC.
as 2:2020cv01384
Defendant:
R & M MASONRY CONTRACTORS, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALCAZAR NETWORKS, INC.
as 5:2019cv03283
Defendant:
ALCAZAR NETWORKS, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEONARD COLLIER ELDERS COUNSELING GROUP, INC.
as 2:2019cv02330
Defendant:
LEONARD COLLIER ELDERS COUNSELING GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Harris Corporation v. Jacobs Telecommunications Inc.
as 1:2019cv00604
Plaintiff:
Harris Corporation
Defendant:
Jacobs Telecommunications Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLSAVSKY v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.
as 2:2018cv01278
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH OLSAVSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAY v. POGORELSKI et al
as 2:2018cv01850
Plaintiff:
SHAWKAT BAY
Defendant:
OLEG W. POGORELSKI, ALPO HOLDINGS INC. and ALPO HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
