Cases 1 - 10 of 67
R&P TECHNOLOGIES INC v. HAYCOX
as 2:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
R&P TECHNOLOGIES INC
Defendant:
TAYLOR HAYCOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
GARRETT et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA,INC et al
as 1:2023cv20971
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GARRETT, CHRISTOPHER ROACH, DEMARIS MARTZ and others
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA,INC and SUBARU CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
TAYLOR v. CARDONE INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
CARDONE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BOWERS et al v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2023cv04222
Plaintiff:
CARLTON BOWERS and KELSEY BOWERS
Defendant:
KEVIN TAYLOR and 413 NORTH ARLINGTON LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SHAREEF v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
KAREEM SHAREEF
Defendant:
SHANAY TAYLOR and STACKZ RENTALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Hobensack v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01983
Plaintiff:
Taylor Hobensack
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Taylor Frac, LLC v. Calfrac Well Services, Ltd.
as 1:2021cv00993
Plaintiff:
Taylor Frac, LLC
Defendant:
Calfrac Well Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASADI et al v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2021cv10238
Plaintiff:
SCOTT TEITSCH, DANIELLE MOYER, JEAN VASADI and others
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
ALCHEM INCORPORATED v. CAGE
as 2:2020cv03142
Defendant:
TAYLOR CAGE
Plaintiff:
ALCHEM INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABI-HANNA et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2019cv17837
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TREZZA, ROSE M. CAMPANARO, HAROLD CAREY and others
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
