Cases 71 - 80 of 594
Cason v. SoClean Incorporated
as 2:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
James Cason
Defendant:
SoClean Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huff v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
John Huff
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ellis v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Seward Ellis
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Petro et al v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Shawn Petro, Mike Fairchild and David Kinchen
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Irvin L. McKlenshaw et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Irvin L. McKlenshaw
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Odom v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00803
Plaintiff:
Chris Odom
Defendant:
SOCLEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Andrea Summers et al v. Koninklijke Philips NV et al
as 2:2022cv00601
Plaintiff:
Andrea Summers and Michael Summers
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
CONLEY et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01486
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. CONLEY, ANGELA SCUNZIANO, PAUL ROHAN and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Eddie Bailey
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Wharton v. SoClean Inc
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Charlie Wharton
Defendant:
SOCLEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
