Cases 101 - 110 of 217
VANN NELSON v. PENNROSE MANAGEMENT REGIONAL et al
as 2:2014cv01063
Plaintiff:
HAROLD DELL VANN NELSON
Defendant:
PENNROSE MANAGEMENT REGIONAL , PENNROSE MANAGEMET NATIONAL and THERESA YANCEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DRYER FARMS, LP v. RANGE RESOURCES - APPALACHIA, LLC
as 2:2014cv01047
Plaintiff:
DRYER FARMS, LP
Defendant:
RANGE RESOURCES - APPALACHIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DIAZ
as 5:2014cv02044
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LYNETTE DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. State Street Building, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00671
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Defendant:
State Street Building, Inc.
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
State Street Building, Inc.
Counterclaim_defendant:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER'S BAY CONDOMINIUM NUMBER II v. T-MOBILE USA, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01841
Plaintiff:
BAKER'S BAY CONDOMINIUM NUMBER II
Defendant:
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Of America v. Andricks
as 3:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Jaclynn J. Andricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
United States Of America v. Strauss
as 1:2014cv00466
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Brett T. Strauss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
United States Of America v. Harris et al
as 1:2014cv00467
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Dawn N. Harris and Kenneth R. Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION v. EAST LIBERTY STATION ASSOCIATES
as 2:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION
Defendant:
EAST LIBERTY STATION ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Ennis et al
as 1:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronnie K. Ennis and Debra L. Ennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
