Cases 11 - 19 of 19
NICKEY v. C. BLACKBURN, INC et al
as 2:2017cv11250
Plaintiff:
ALFRED F. NICKEY
Defendant:
C. BLACKBURN, INC, JERRY A PIERRE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHARLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2016cv02187
Plaintiff:
EMANUELLE JEAN-PIERRE CHARLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JULIE A. WHITE, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ROSA-PIERRE v. SHARP et al
as 5:2015cv06001
Plaintiff:
HEIDY ROSA-PIERRE
Defendant:
FRANKLIN SHARP and CAMPBELL'S AUTO EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVILSON et al v. JUAREZ
as 2:2015cv02494
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE DAVILSON and MARIE PIERRE
Defendant:
RUBEN JUAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLIEN v. PIACENTI et al
as 2:2013cv01813
Plaintiff:
PIERRE MILLIEN
Defendant:
DAVID M. PIACENTI, JR., ARAMARK , ARATEX SERVICES, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
ARAMARK
Cross_defendant:
ARAMARK , ARATEX SERVICES, INC., JOHN DOES I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
TAYLOR-FORD et al v. STEP, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06768
Plaintiff:
MAURINE TAYLOR-FORD and PIERRE FORD
Defendant:
STEP, INC., STEUPHROSINIA OF POLAZAC MISSION, INC., GENADY POJILENKO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERRE v. MCDONALD et al
as 2:2010cv02951
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PIERRE
Defendant:
ROBERT MCDONALD and MARIA MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLEMAN et al v. ATHEY TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01159
Plaintiff:
PIERRE COLEMAN and TAMIRA COLEMAN
Defendant:
ATHEY TRUCKING, INC., ALICE ATHEY, BERRA SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SOUFFRANT et al v. HYROWICH et al
as 2:2007cv04475
Plaintiff:
PIERRE D. SOUFFRANT, SHAWN JOSEPH SOUFFRANT and MARIE MICHELLE SOUFFRANT
Defendant:
DAVID W. HYROWICH and TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
