Cases 31 - 40 of 11,818
MCELROY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv06762
Plaintiff:
EDWARD P MCELROY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
ROMERO v. FEDEX CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv06764
Plaintiff:
ARELIS ROMERO
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND, CHRISTOPHER J. TAVERAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
NEVIUS et al v. STOREY
as 2:2024cv02456
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP NEVIUS and MYRA NEVIUS
Defendant:
EILEEN P. STOREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
VALLE v. KENNEY
as 2:2024cv02459
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER VALLE
Defendant:
CHAD KENNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
SOLANKI et al v. NELSON et al
as 2:2024cv02473
Plaintiff:
ZAHID SOLANKI, FARJANA SOLANKI, ABDUL JABBAR QURESHI and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY W. NELSON and THIE HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Blanchard Jr et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Glennister Blanchard Jr and Kathleen Blanchard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Montgomery v. Russo
as 2:2024cv02440
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Montgomery
Defendant:
Genevive Russo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
GOOSLBY v. WATSON et al
as 2:2024cv06670
Plaintiff:
MIHWA GOOSLBY
Other:
DEVANTA WATSON and AL & AY TRANSPORTATION INC.
Cross Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 and ABC CORP. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VALORANI-RUGGIERO v. LAVERNE et al
as 2:2024cv06679
Plaintiff:
ROBIN VALORANI-RUGGIERO
Defendant:
RICHARD D LAVERNE, LE&R ENTERPRISE, JOHN DOE I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
JAVIER v. CANNON et al
as 2:2024cv02407
Plaintiff:
ANEL HIPOLITO JAVIER
Defendant:
BRYAN J CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
