Cases 31 - 40 of 7,282
Woodrow et al v. Doman et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Lacie Woodrow and Everett Meehling
Defendant:
Evangeline Doman and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
ASBIE v. PADILLA ET AL
as 2:2024cv01637
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN ASBIE
Defendant:
YUSLEIDYS PADILLA, YP TRANSPORT LLC, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
FLEMING v. SYNEOS HEALTH INC
as 2:2024cv02552
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FLEMING
Defendant:
SYNEOS HEALTH INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
RICCI v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
AMANDA RICCI
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY and CAROL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
DULANEY et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
David Dulaney and Anita Dulaney
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
SLAMPAK et al v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
STEVEN K. SLAMPAK and PAMELA J. SLAMPAK
Defendant:
HENRY L. SIMMONS and WESTERN EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
WATERS et al v. AVERSA
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
CHAD WATERS and SCOTT WATERS
Defendant:
SHIRLEY AVERSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
VU et al v. MAX SERVICES CORP et al
as 5:2024cv02509
Plaintiff:
KIM VU and Andrew Gasser
Defendant:
MAX SERVICES CORP and MARCO A MIRANDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
FRANKOVICH v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANKOVICH
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Diliberto v. Gypsum Express LTD et al
as 5:2024cv01671
Plaintiff:
Colleen Diliberto
Defendant:
Peter Severin and Gypsum Express LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
