Cases 1 - 7 of 7
FLYNN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2017cv04686
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA FLYNN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ELIZABETH ATKINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MUCERINO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL et al
as 2:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
MELODY MUCERINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GERALD TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PINTO et al v. STEELE et al
as 1:2013cv07858
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PINTO and DOROTHY PINTO
Defendant:
IRA STEELE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMMOND et al v. KIM et al
as 2:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY HAMMOND and TAMMY HAMMOND
Defendant:
JANICE KIM, US MARSHALLS SERVICE , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
VELASQUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv04799
Plaintiff:
HUGO A. VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES SIMPSON, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MACK v. SARRIS et al
as 2:2011cv00883
Plaintiff:
TRACEY MACK
Defendant:
PETER M. SARRIS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
TORRES et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL (CCL/DGR) CIVIL LITIGATION SECTION et al
as 2:2008cv02899
Plaintiff:
NELLIE TORRES and GLADYS MCGILL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL (CCL/DGR) CIVIL LITIGATION SECTION, ERIK RUSS and JEFF BREEZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
