Cases 81 - 90 of 452
BURD v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2020cv03095
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
AMY BURD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREDRICK v. PEGUERO-NOVA et al
as 2:2020cv01280
Defendant:
CARLOS A. PEGUERO-NOVA, CARLOS NOVA, CARLOS A. PEGUERO and others
Plaintiff:
CARLA FREDRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEGAL v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv21716
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, ABC CORPORATION 1-5, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BAILA SEGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUNSTAN v. TIME DEFINITE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20912
Defendant:
ERNESTO CASTRO, NY MACHINERY INC., TIME DEFINITE SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HUNTLEY C. DUNSTAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
KASSIEN v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2019cv20689
Plaintiff:
JANELLE KASSIEN
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SISOLAK et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 3:2018cv11821
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BOLCH and JOHN SISOLAK
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
ALBERTSON v. HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04396
Defendant:
HORSEPOWER HARLEY DAVIDSON, HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR CO., INC., HORSEPOWER HARLEY DAVIDSON, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BRENDA ALBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARRON v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv05108
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA and HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING ALABAMA
Plaintiff:
TYNAE BARRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ESTERLIS et al v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA et al
as 3:2019cv19864
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, JOYSON SAFETY SYSTEMS, KEY SAFETY SYSTEMS and others
Plaintiff:
MIKHAIL ESTERLIS and ESFIRA ESTERLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2019cv19114
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE POWELL, RYAN HICKS, DANIEL BINKLEY and others
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
