Cases 51 - 60 of 158
JENNINGS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2020cv16978
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
NICODEMUS JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ROBINSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv05079
Plaintiff:
DREMA ROBINSON, DREMA TAYLOR and ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITES STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Scott v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2020cv01292
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SPERBER et al v. JORDAN et al
as 2:2020cv06257
Defendant:
JOHN E JORDAN, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, M. RANFT and others
Plaintiff:
PETER SPERBER and BARBARA SPERBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRODER et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2020cv01836
Plaintiff:
LOU BRODER and PAULA BRODER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
MICHAUD v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2020cv04318
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-5 (names being fictitious as true identities are unknown at this time), UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and JOHN DOE 1-5
Plaintiff:
DONNA MICHAUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
SINGH v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv01346
Defendant:
HONORABLE MEGAN J. BRENNAN, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
DEBRA SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
PAULSEN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2020cv01180
Plaintiff:
BONNIE K. PAULSEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
CORTESE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2019cv07939
Plaintiff:
GAIL CORTESE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN DOE 1-10 and JANE DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
