Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MACK v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv03685
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MERCK & CO., INC. and JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN MACK
3Rd Party Defendant:
SBM Management Services, LP and West Point Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Villanova et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as 2:2020cv06244
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., John Doe, Inc. No.2, Jones Lang Lasalle of Pennsylvania, Inc. doing business as JONES LANG LASALLE AND JLL and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Villanova and Leonard Villanova
Cross Claimant:
Jones Lang Lasalle - Northeast, Jones Lang Lasalle of Pennsylvania, Inc., JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KERRIGAN v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2016cv01804
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE KERRIGAN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Takamori et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv04241
Plaintiff:
Lois Takamori and Neal Takamori
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYERLY et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01556
Plaintiff:
AMY F. LYERLY and JOHN LYERLY
Defendant:
ORGANON USA, INC., ORGANON PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ORGANON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flynn v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02485
Plaintiff:
GREGORY FLYNN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alicea-Figueroa et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02326
Plaintiff:
Alexis Alicea-Figueroa, Carmen Ruiz-Pagan, Conjugal Partnership Alicea-Ruiz and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.
Consol Plaintiff:
James Cumba, Olimba Pineda, Conjugal Partnership Cumba-Pineda and others
Consol Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc. and SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
