Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Grube et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2020cv00638
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C R Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Grube and Willard Titus Grube
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aceto et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02085
Defendant:
ETHICON INC, C R BARD INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
Jayne Aceto and Joseph Aceto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRENNAN v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20819
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRENNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TURNER v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv19705
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARCUS TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TURNER v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv19730
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARCUS TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ADDIS v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv19695
Plaintiff:
JAMES A ADDIS
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDREWS et al v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv19696
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREWS and SHARON ANDREWS
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL et al v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv19697
Plaintiff:
SARA CAMPBELL and DANIEL KRAFT
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05186
Defendant:
C R BARD INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Sutton and Glenn Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRACKMAN v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as 2:2019cv18279
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC, MENTOR CORPORATION, C. R. BARD, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Maritza Brackman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
