Cases 101 - 110 of 1,140
Lattimorre v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Heather Lattimorre
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Renn v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Donna Renn
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Williams-Redding v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
Edda D. Williams-Redding
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Lakin v. SoClean Inc
as 2:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lakin
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PETITION OF LESLIE WILLIS TO PERPETUATE EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO 'THE TRUST FOR ANNIE PEARL (WHITE) WILLIS'
as 2:2022mc00588
In Re:
PETITION OF LESLIE WILLIS TO PERPETUATE EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO 'THE TRUST FOR ANNIE PEARL (WHITE) WILLIS'
Petitioner:
LESLIE WILLIS
Respondent:
DOLORES WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
ASEA/AFSCME LOCAL 52 HEALTH BENEFITS TRUST v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv00909
Plaintiff:
ASEA/AFSCME LOCAL 52 HEALTH BENEFITS TRUST
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
ORBITAL ENGINEERING, INC. v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
ORBITAL ENGINEERING, INC.
Defendant:
OVIDIO RODRIGUEZ and CARLOS R. GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC v. TEXAS FIRST CAPITAL, INC.
as 5:2022cv02461
Plaintiff:
NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC
Defendant:
TEXAS FIRST CAPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Marywood University v. Synergi Partners, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Marywood University
Defendant:
Synergi Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
