Cases 71 - 80 of 1,140
MIRARCHI v. MARSHALL & SWIFT
as 2:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
ERCOLE A. MIRARCHI
Defendant:
MARSHALL & SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MARSHALL v. HIGHMARK, INC.
as 2:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
WENDY MARSHALL
Defendant:
HIGHMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
IN RE: NEELY
as 2:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
JAMES CURTIS NEELY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TRIDENT E&P, LLC v. HP, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03030
Plaintiff:
TRIDENT E&P, LLC
Defendant:
HP, INC. and HPI FEDERAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NEXUS 1, LLC et al v. SIDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
NEXUS 1, LLC and NEX-STOCK, LLC
Defendant:
STEPHEN SIDWELL and NEXII BUILDING SOLUTIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
MCGAUGHRAN v. NATIONAL TAX EXPERTS et al
as 5:2022cv04430
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MCGAUGHRAN
Defendant:
NATIONAL TAX EXPERTS,, PATRICK OAKES and DOES 1 THROUGH 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
GILL et al v. VBIT TECHNOLOGIES CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv00150
Defendant:
DANH CONG VO, VBIT TECHNOLOGIES CORP., VBIT MINING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KOMLIKA GILL, MAMTA KHATIWALA, AMITA SINGH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CHOWDHURY v. CONNEXIN SOFTWARE, INC.
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
IKRAM CHOWDHURY
Defendant:
CONNEXIN SOFTWARE, INC. d/b/a OFFICE PRACTICUM and CONNEXIN SOFTWARE, INC. doing business as OFFICE PRACTICUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BARLETTI v. CONNEXIN SOFTWARE, INC.
as 2:2022cv04979
Plaintiff:
KAZANDRA BARLETTI
Defendant:
CONNEXIN SOFTWARE, INC. doing business as OFFICE PRACTICUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SEIDL v. CHICCO USA, INC.
as 5:2022cv02586
Plaintiff:
CANDACE SEIDL
Defendant:
CHICCO USA, INC. and ARTSANA USA, INC. doing business as CHICCO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
