Cases 1 - 10 of 75
RAMIREZ v. AUTO DREAMS USA et al
as 3:2016cv02549
Plaintiff:
SILVIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
AUTO DREAMS USA, CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION , BENJAMIN FRENKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
MAJER v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE et al
as 3:2015cv08810
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAJER
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATION 1-10, PMAC LENDING SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
FOTI v. TOYOTA MOTORS SALES, U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2015cv06625
Plaintiff:
REGINA M FOTI
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTORS SALES, U.S.A., INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HORAN et al v. VERANO et al
as 2:2015cv01785
Plaintiff:
JAMES HORAN and HEATHER HORAN
Defendant:
JOHN VERANO, FRONTGATE FINANCIAL, LLC, PACIFIC UNION FINANCIAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
ANDRESS et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01779
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ANDRESS and GEORGE ANDRESS
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
PAI v. SANTANDER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2014cv06601
Plaintiff:
ANNE MARIE K. PAI
Defendant:
SANTANDER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
CANDELET v. ROTH et al
as 2:2014cv01442
Plaintiff:
AIMEE CANDELET
Defendant:
MIKE ROTH, SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
JUBELT v. UNITED MORTGAGE BANKERS, LTD et al
as 2:2013cv07150
Plaintiff:
JOHN JUBELT
Defendant:
UNITED MORTGAGE BANKERS, LTD , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BRYAN CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
KNOX v. HOMAIJANI et al
as 2:2013cv04121
Plaintiff:
SANJA KNOX
Defendant:
DAVID HOMAIJANI and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
