Cases 1 - 5 of 5
HEROD URBAN RENEWAL, LLC et al v. PVC INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv19043
Plaintiff:
THE SIENA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., UNIT OWNERS OF THE SIENA CONDOMINIUM and J.H. MACK, LLC doing business as KOHL CONSTRUCTION GROUP
Defendant:
THE SIENA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUAL UNIT OWNERS, HEROD URBAN RENEWAL, LLC, HEROD REDEVELOPMENT I, LLC and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
BRIAN M STOLAR
3Rd Party Defendant:
ACIES GROUP, LLC, AIR MASTER, INC., ALFA STEEL CONSTRUCTION and others
Not Yet Classified:
MEGA CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
MRL Development I LLC, et al v. Whitecap Investment Corp, et al
as 15-1923
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MRL DEVELOPMENT I LLC and MICHAEL R. LUCHT
Defendant - Appellant:
WHITECAP INVESTMENT CORP, DBA Paradise Lumber
Defendant - Appellee:
GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING INC, PUTNAM LUMBER AND EXPORT CO and PUTNAM FAMILY PROPERTIES INC
MRL Development I LLC, et al v. Whitecap Investment Corp, et al
as 15-1922
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MRL DEVELOPMENT I LLC and MICHAEL R. LUCHT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHITECAP INVESTMENT CORP, DBA Paradise Lumber and GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING INC
Defendant - Appellant:
PUTNAM LUMBER AND EXPORT CO and PUTNAM FAMILY PROPERTIES INC
MRL Development I LLC, et al v. Whitecap Investment Corp, et al
as 15-1921
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MRL DEVELOPMENT I LLC and MICHAEL R. LUCHT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHITECAP INVESTMENT CORP, DBA Paradise Lumber, PUTNAM LUMBER AND EXPORT CO and PUTNAM FAMILY PROPERTIES INC
Defendant - Appellant:
GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING INC
MRL Development I, LLC, et al v. Whitecap Investment Corp, et al
as 14-4738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MRL DEVELOPMENT I, LLC and MICHAEL R. LUCHT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHITECAP INVESTMENT CORP, DBA Paradise Lumber, GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING INC, PUTNAM LUMBER AND EXPORT CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
