Banks and Banking Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 171 - 180 of 413
Collins v. Mackrell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00734
Plaintiff: Harry T. Collins
Defendant: Mackrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruppersberger v. M&T Bank
as 1:2013cv00684
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ruppersberger
Defendant: M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. TD. BANK, N.A.
as 2:2013cv01870
Plaintiff: TONY DPHAX KING
Defendant: TD. BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PECK v. PECK et al
as 1:2013cv01934
Plaintiff: RICHARD L. PECK
Defendant: REINA MORALES PECK, PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 322 AND/OR LOCAL 322 ANNUITY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
MCCLAIN v. RBS CITIZEN'S BANK, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01547
Plaintiff: LISA MCCLAIN
Defendant: RBS CITIZEN'S BANK, N.A. and CITIZEN'S BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
DICIOCCIO v. WOODY'S BAR et al
as 2:2013cv01523
Plaintiff: DANIEL DICIOCCIO
Defendant: WOODY'S BAR and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
CODY v. TRAVEL SHOP et al
as 2:2013cv01445
Plaintiff: JONATHAN CODY
Defendant: TRAVEL SHOP and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
LOUIS v. ASIAN BANK
as 2:2013cv01447
Plaintiff: CHERYL LOUIS
Defendant: ASIAN BANK
Cause Of Action: Violation of Prov. of Subchpt.VI (Electronic Fund Transfers)
CODY v. CHESTNUT FRESHGROCER et al
as 2:2013cv01446
Plaintiff: JONATHAN CODY
Defendant: CHESTNUT FRESHGROCER and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
MCDEVITT v. UNBS INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01424
Plaintiff: JOHN MCDEVITT
Defendant: UNBS INC., SAL'S OMEGA PIZZA INC. and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?