Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 101 - 110 of 608
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv19408
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION d/b/a THE SPINE AND SPORTS HEALTH CENTER, ALEXANDER VISCO, M.D., MICHAEL KELLY, D.C. and others
Cross Claimant: RON BEN-MEIR
Cross Defendant: JOHN DE HOYOS, TORAL DOSHI and EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02639
Defendant: JULIA IOFFE, M.D., CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC doing business as ACUPUNCTURE & CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC OF N.J., TAE YOUNG HONG, D.C., L.AC. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant: CLINICA DE ACUPUNTURA Y SALUD NATURAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO et al v. MIAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00233
Defendant: ATA CHAUDHRY, SHAHID MIAN, SURGERY CENTER OF ORADELL, LLC and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. ACCELERATED REHAB AND PAIN MANAGEMENT, P.A. et al
as 2:2020cv16361
Defendant: LEO STATEN, D.O., ACCELERATED REHAB AND PAIN MANAGEMENT, P.A., MEDICSURG, P.C. and others
Plaintiff: GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SMIT v. TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02594
Plaintiff: GERALD SMIT
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER NJ, JOHN DOES and OCEAN COUNTY NJ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. SALL MYERS ASSOCIATES, P.A. et al
as 2:2021cv19841
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: SALL MYERS ASSOCIATES, P.A., STEVEN DANE, M.D., PAUL MISTHOS, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. MOUNT PROSPECT CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00737
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: MOUNT PROSPECT CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, P.A. doing business as MOUNT PROSPECT HEALTH CENTER, TERRY MCSWEENEY, D.C., HASSAN MEDICAL PAIN RELIEF AND WELLNESS CENTER LLC doing business as HASSAN SPINE AND SPORTS MEDICINE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JOHNSON v. THE TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv02698
Plaintiff: RYAN JOHNSON
Defendant: THE TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, KEVIN DALE, JESSE DECRESCENZO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP
as 1:2022cv02594
Plaintiff: GERALD SMIT
Defendant: TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. BERGER, D.C. et al
as 2:2022cv00682
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: PETER BERGER, D.C., HAWTHORNE PAIN & SPINE CENTER, LLC, JON-PAUL DADAIAN, M.D., and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?