Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PUBLIC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05904
Defendant:
BEVERLY SACKLER, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., ACTAVIS KADIAN LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv15809
Defendant:
DR. RICHARD SACKLER, WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE INC., RITE AID CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv13747
Defendant:
DR. RICHARD SACKLER, ESTATE OF MORTIMER SACKLER, WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv01018
Defendant:
BEVERLY SACKLER, RICHARD S. SACKLER, PURDUE PHARMA L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv12313
Defendant:
ESTATE OF MORTIMER SACKLER, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, RITE AID CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CAMDEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv11983
Defendant:
ESTATE OF MORTIMER SACKLER, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, RITE AID CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CAMDEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv11210
Defendant:
RICHARD SACKLER, ESTATE OF MORTIMER SACKLER, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BERGEN COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv08845
Plaintiff:
BERGEN COUNTY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., DR. RICHARD SACKLER, ESTATE OF MORTIMER SACKLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
