Cases 1 - 10 of 144
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. TARAKHCHYAN, D.C. et al
as 3:2024cv06952
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SAKO TARAKHCHYAN, D.C., PARKWAY AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER, LLC, SHAHID MIAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. TARAKHCHYAN, D.C. et al
as 2:2024cv06952
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SAKO TARAKHCHYAN, D.C., PARKWAY AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER, LLC, SHAHID MIAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ABBASSY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv05853
Plaintiff:
SAMIRA ABBASSY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and CCC INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JONES et al v. CVS HEALTH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01703
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, SILVERSCRIPT INSURANCE COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE ELAYNE JONES and MARILYN A. MANZI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. SPINE & JOINT CARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SPINE & JOINT CARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, CORE CARE CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, PLATINUM PHYSICAL THERAPY & WELLNESS LLC and others
Other:
MICHAEL CARBONE, ANCIENT & MODERN ACUPUNCTURE P.C. and YEVGENIY VOLOSHCHUK
Cross Defendant:
MARIE MEAWAD, MENA MOUWAD and PERTH AMBOY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. MARSH, D.O. et al
as 2:2023cv21192
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ANTHONY MARSH, D.O., ANTHONY MARSH, D.O. -OSTEOPATHIC MEDICAL, PAIN AND REHABILITATION INSTITUTE, P.C. doing business as THE OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, PAIN AND REHABILITATION INSTITUTE, ARTHUR CORETH, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
EWIDEH et al v. KEYSTONE ADVANCED REMODELING, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03032
Plaintiff:
OMAR EWIDEH and NIVERTITI GEAITH
Defendant:
KEYSTONE ADVANCED REMODELING, LLC, BEACON BUILDING PRODUCTS, FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. PRESTIGE HEALTH CENTER, PC et al
as 2:2023cv03468
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
PRESTIGE HEALTH CENTER, PC, COMPREHENSIVE PAIN MEDICINE AND ANESTHESIA GROUP PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, ROMAN KOSIBOROD, M.D. and others
Cross Claimant:
CLIFFORD ACUPUNCTURE & HERB, PC
Cross Defendant:
JI YONG KIM, L.Ac.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. NATALE et al
as 1:2023cv02338
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
MICHAEL NATALE, PH.D. and MICHAEL NATALE, PH.D., LLC
Cross Defendant:
ADAM J. BENN, D.C., ATLAS CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, ABHIJEET RASTOGI, M.D. and others
Defendant:
HAMILTON PAIN AND REHAB ASSOCIATES, LLC and STEVE ALBERTI, D.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. MENKIN, M.D. et al
as 3:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SERGE MENKIN, M.D., THE CENTER FOR JOINT & SPINE RELIEF, PA, LAWRENCE PETRACCO, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
