Cases 111 - 120 of 6,737
JUSTO v. Warden FCI Fort Dix
as 2:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
Warden FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LINDSEY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv23287
Petitioner:
SIMONE LINDSEY
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RYAN O' DEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLEVELAND v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv23311
Petitioner:
RAHEEM CLEVELAND
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREENE v. CHARLES
as 2:2023cv23364
Petitioner:
GEORGE GREENE
Respondent:
RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALLAH v. THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv23365
Petitioner:
JUSTICE INFINITE ALLAH
Respondent:
THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPATARO v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv22369
Petitioner:
MICHEAL SPATARO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HALGAS v. BURLINGTON COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv22125
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALGAS
Respondent:
BURLINGTON COUNTY and MATTHEW LEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOSS v. PITTMAN et al
as 2:2023cv22351
Petitioner:
HORATIO JOSS
Respondent:
YOLANDA PITTMAN, JOHN TSOUKARIS and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAILE v. DEGNER
as 1:2023cv22861
Petitioner:
TONY HAILE
Respondent:
ANTHONY DEGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VALENCIA v. WARDEN,
as 1:2023cv22338
Petitioner:
LUIS DAVID MARTIN VALENCIA
Respondent:
WARDEN,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
