General Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 31 - 40 of 55
SANTIAGO v SHULTZ
as 1:2008cv06146
Petitioner: LUIS SANTIAGO
Respondent: PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GARCIA v. SCHULTZ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv05761
Petitioner: KHADDY GARCIA
Respondent: PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CANNON v. SCHULTZ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv04514
Petitioner: BRADFORD CANNON
Respondent: PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
COOPER v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv02851
Petitioner: ANDREW COOPER
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, F.B.O.P. FCI FAIRTON and PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GOLDEN v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2008cv02601
Petitioner: TYREIK GOLDEN
Respondent: PAUL SCHULTZ and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
COOPER v. WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2008cv02250
Plaintiff: ANDREW COOPER
Defendant: WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ, F.B.O.P. FCI FAIRTON and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DELGADO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv02074
Petitioner: BRANDON DELGADO
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DANTZLER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv01837
Petitioner: MICHAEL DANTZLER
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BLAKNEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv01836
Petitioner: JAMES BLAKNEY
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SHARIF v. WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ
as 1:2008cv01350
Petitioner: RAJAHN OMAR SHARIF
Respondent: WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?