Cases 41 - 50 of 55
HARRISON v. SCHULTZ
as 1:2008cv01178
Petitioner:
ANTONIO HARRISON
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SHORT v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2008cv00186
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SHORT
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ, FCI FAIRTON and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SULASKI v. SCHULTZ
as 1:2007cv05518
Petitioner:
JEFFREY P. SULASKI
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WASHINGTON v. SCHULTZ
as 1:2007cv04523
Petitioner:
ARTHUR WASHINGTON
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEVENS v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2007cv03502
Petitioner:
RODNEY STEVENS
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DELGADO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv03361
Petitioner:
BRANDON DELGADO
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ESCRIBANO v. SCHULTZ
as 1:2007cv03204
Petitioner:
DANIEL REYES ESCRIBANO
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GUIDICE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv03055
Petitioner:
FRANK GUIDICE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PAUL SCHULTZ and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NUCKOLS v. SCHULTZ
as 1:2007cv02319
Petitioner:
HARRY T. NUCKOLS
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLAKNEY v. SCHULTZ
as 1:2007cv01946
Petitioner:
JAMES BLAKNEY
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
