Cases 51 - 60 of 6,747
VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv05635
Petitioner:
EFRAIN VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEVIVO v. FRANCESCHINNI
as 1:2024cv05639
Petitioner:
LISA A. DEVIVO
Respondent:
REBECCA FRANCESCHINNI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WICK v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05632
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. WICK
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PEREZ v. MERENDINO
as 1:2024cv04083
Petitioner:
MARCO PEREZ
Respondent:
(Warden) S. MERENDINO and WARDEN S. MERENDINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALEJO v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv04421
Petitioner:
CARLOS VALEJO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIZK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05590
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SARRO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05577
Petitioner:
BRIAN SARRO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAMPANA v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv04177
Petitioner:
DENNIS CAMPANA
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIVERA GARCIA v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv03803
Petitioner:
JORGE F RIVERA GARCIA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPENCER-HILL v. KELSEY
as 1:2024cv05402
Petitioner:
JASON T. SPEUCER-HILL
Respondent:
DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
